Monday, December 31, 2007

Okay, Robert Lindsay is the Third Coolest Commie*, ever

Alexander Cockburn is really the coolest commie after Limonov. Cockburn's end-0f-year retrospective on 07, has got me ready to storm the bastille.  On the bushes, the democrats, horowitz, dershowitz, chrisopher hitchens, imus, sharpton... down they go like ducks in a galley.
Surprising support for the second amendment, a most fair-minded (but wrong) defense of hucabee and two good Ron Paul plugs. Seriously, read the whole thing.

*living, Robert Lindsay is the third coolest living commie, ever. but only because he's temporarily sidetracked by some genome hair-splitting field trip, after which I'm sure he'll be rested up and ready to rrrawk!

update - he's back and battlin' (after the VA loan post) the bad guys.  Glad to see I'm not the only one with photo issues on blogger.

Sunday, December 30, 2007

The Perfect as the Enemy of the Good Part.1

Regarding Ron Paul's Iowa Ad, and Justin Raimondo's complaint:

Steady on, guys. This is the first time I've disagreed with anything Justin said, and not on the merits, but the Silber-level cry of fire in the night. I'm sure it was a campaign blunder to go after the two dozen tancredo supporters that didn't swing to romney as directed. I bet Paul's views are closer to Vijay Boyapati's, and that Paul will handle this masterfully, if he doesn't take too much friendly fire. Geez

In Halo, when you accidently shoot you own guys, it means you're supposed to be in front of them!

Et tu, Pat?

The recent series of open letters to Ron Paul doubters on LewRockwell.com prompts me to write my own to Pat Buchanan.  I can't decide on what kind of tone I should take, though, so I'm just going to ask why he isn't loudly and enthusiastically supporting Ron Paul.

I saw him on CSPAN/Sirius's POTUS08 and he was given the opportunity to say who he favors and he did mention Ron Paul, although couched in typical "I disagree with some of his policies" tepid support.  This was after Pat explained that he (Buchanan) had left the Republican Party in 2000 and that they did not reward disloyalty.  He also said that it looks like the surge is working and we couldn't just pull out of Iraq.  He's carrying Bush's water after having opposed all of Bush's policies, when he just admitted that they never forget or forgive. 

What is Pat up to? The only thing that I can think is that he loves his present position as "cranky conservative elder" media guy and wants to maintain his credibility if Paul goes down in flames.  I don't want to believe that because the Paul candidacy IS the Buchanan revolution. I hope he's just keeping his powder dry, but c'mon eileen! I maxed my donations to the Buchanan campaign when he won NH and then the Republican establishment locked arms against him.  I remember quite clearly.  Why doesn't he?

 Pat - march toward the sound of the guns!

Monday, December 24, 2007

"The Admiral is Afraid that the Alliance knows about the Airshaft Flaw in the Deathstar"


r2d2-Justin Raimondo
c3po-Karen De Coster
Obi-Wan - Burt Blumert
(young Obi-Wan) Anthony Gregory
Laia - Karen Kwiotkowtski
Yoda - Paul Gottfried
Luke - Ron Paul
Han Solo - Lew Rockwell
Chewbacca - Pat Buchanan
Jaba - Ahmed Chalabi
Emperor - Rupert Murdoch
Darth Vader - Richard Pearl
Boba Fett - William Crystal
Darth Maul - Dick Cheney
Irritating Jaba-mascot muppet - George Junior
Stormtroopers - Free Republic

Friday, December 21, 2007

As if further proof were needed


The story was that the Army was beefing up its weapons distribution system, increasing the staff from six to seventy and bringing in a general from the Reserve. This could be for two reasons, either stuff was not properly accounted for, or it wasn't going out fast enough, or (probably) both. My theory, that nothing happens politically by accident, leads me to assert that the entire Iraq project was simply to introduce chaos to the region and to keep the military there until the chaos becomes self-sustaining. There is a plausible case to be made that circumstances were such that we needed to get cash in circulation so fast that we couldn't account for it; eight-to-twelve Billion is what I've heard. Occam's razor cuts away all but the most likely explanation, graft and corruption; however they were trying to bootstrap a dollar economy, and they needed to kill the native currency (or absorb it by favorable conversion rates). Okay, I don't like it, but I'll accept it.

It's a much different matter with weapons though. I'm assuming we're talking about small arms. If we're giving anyone heavy or sophisticated weapons, all bets are off, except it lends even more support for my diplomacy by arson theory. So we're giving arms and money to purchase arms to those we already know to be corrupt and/or infiltrated by those we're fighting before, now and in the future. The newly beefed-up supply operation is to try to direct the aid to approved individuals or groups and keep it out of the hands of all others. To me, especially considering the recent withdrawl of the British, the timing and apparent (oh, sorry Sen. McCain), the success of the surge, it looks like we're hurrying up arming the Sunnis, so that we can withdraw to the bases (or completely if President Paul takes over) and wait until the Iraqis sort things out. That is, completely destroy themselves and as many Kurds, Turks, Syrian, and Persians as possible, sign on oil deal with whoever's still standing, and start pumping! Who's your daddy?






http://www.armytimes.com/news/2007/12/ap_weaponssales_071220w/

Thursday, December 6, 2007

"This isn't about restricting freedom of opinion, it's about examining what the limits are."

Wikipedia Too Nazi - How much is just right? 
Maybe they can get Robert Lindsay to testify that the truth is what was edited by the last guy to shut off the computer and go to bed muttering to himself.

Wednesday, December 5, 2007

"Watch where you're pointing that thing, Ollie!"


Hoo boy, poor old Huckleberry! I'm surprised he didn't see that coming, considering other Arkansans who've been on both ends of the stick.  Maybe he didn't think they'd do it to a preacher, or he still hasn't figured out that it's the Republicans turn to take a dive like Kerry did. 
(btw- did anyone else pick up that kid that got tazed in Florida was asking Kerry why he didn't even try in '04, and the way Kerry just kept droning on his speech while the cops swarmed the screaming kid?)

 I think Kerry's trying to tell us that the worst part of surrender to the borg is having to fake enthusiasm, something Romney and Huck are going to have to figure out.  The other Republicans except Paul, are suitably grim visaged, as if they know they're the goat this time, "taking one for the team", remember Dole? 

 I wish I knew more sports terminology. What's the guy called that takes the dive in boxing?  Diver? Designated loser? Whatever, we're lucky the other Clinton isn't running again.